Twee Grieks-orthodoxe kerkleiders hebben paus Franciscus in een 89 pagina's tellende brief aangemaand het pad naar het ware orthodoxe geloof, waarvan de paus zich volgens hen steeds sterker lijkt te verwijderen, terug te vinden. De metropolieten Andreas van Dryinoupolis en Seraphin van Pyreus benadrukken dat zij hun vermanende brief 'uit liefde' schrijven. Tegelijk beklemtonen zij dat het orthodoxe geloof en pausschap onverzoenbaar zijn.
Zij baseren hun aanklacht op de traditionele meningsverschillen tussen de katholieke en de orthodoxe Kerk, onder meer over het primaatschap van de paus. Maar er wordt eveneens verwezen naar handelingen van de paus, zoals het verlenen van een aflaat via Twitter of de zegening van een motor van Harley Davidson. Metropoliet Seraphin, een bekend tegenstander van elke toenadering met de katholieke Kerk, uitte in 2012 al eens een serie gelijkaardige beschuldigingen tegen paus Benedictus XVI (2005-2013).
Bron: KerkNet/I.Media
Link:
http://www.kerknet.be/actua/nieuws_detail.php?nieuwsID=122354
Link naar Vatican Insider:
http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/en/world-news/detail/articolo/ortodossi-ortodoxa-orthodox-francesco-francisco-francis-33491/
Enkele bedenkingen:
Op zich een erg merkwaardig bericht op 'Kerknet'.
Dit is natuurlijk géén nieuws, toch pikt 'Kerknet' het op.
Waar 'Kerknet' en deze twee schismatieke Grieks-Orthodoxe 'bisschoppen' mekaar vinden, is natuurlijk in het feit, dat ook 'Kerknet' het primaatschap van de Paus niet aanvaardt.
Dit staat natuurlijk los van de figuur van Bergoglio, die 'Kerknet' toch zo graag ophemelt.
De alliantie Bergoglio / Kerknet vindt zijn oorsprong in het feit, dat Kerknet natuurlijk denkt, dat Bergoglio, het primaatschap van de Paus zal ondermijnen.
We moeten de twee schismatieke 'bisschoppen' alvast bedanken, om even de puntjes op de 'i' te zetten.
De twee schismatieke 'bisschoppen' beschuldigen Bergoglio van syncretisme, pan-religie, New Age en New World Order.
Bergoglio heeft een probleem. De schismatiekers vertrouwen hem niet. Bergoglio is te links en te veel een modernist.
Door het gedrag van Bergoglio wordt de kloof tussen 'Katholieken' en 'Orthodoxen' alleen maar groter.
Van die 'oecumene' zal voorlopig dus weinig in huis komen!
Wordt vervolgd... Waarschijnlijk in Jeruzalem.
ENKELE CITATEN:
April 10, 2014
Greece
To His Excellency, Francis,
Head of State of the Vatican City
Vatican City, Rome
Your Excellency,
I) CRISIS IN THE VATICAN
II) THE SECULARIZATION AND SPIRITUAL DECLINE OF THE VATICAN
The absence of spirituality in the western heresy
has driven it into such absurdities that now even the “Pope” causes media storms with his “hip” persona!
III) THE RESIGNATION OF HIS EXCELLENCY, BENEDICT
The ink was barely dry on the dramatic announcement of the resignation of His
Excellency, Benedict, and hardly had the tears dried on the faces when the first bomb was
dropped, which, in all probability, was connected to his “quiet” resignation. In a report of
special interest, which was brought to light by the Greek website “ΞΥΠΝΗΣΤΕ ΡΕ,” we
read: “A German Pope abandons the Vatican and a German banker arrives. Ernstvon
Freyberg, who is 54 years old, will take over the reigns of a bank with 6 billion Euros and
44,000 secret accounts, amongst which is the Pontiff’s own account. The taking over of
the management of the Vatican Bank by the German banker is expected on 24th of May
2012, after his predecessor, Ettore Gotti Tedeschi, was dismissed for wanting the
finances of the Vatican to become more transparent. During this year the Bank was left
without a head, a fact which inflated the rumors about the non-transparency of the Pope’s
finances!” That is only a first answer to those who have rushed to have a look behind the
“pure motives” of the resignation! So much for the “holy business” of the “Holy See,” of
the “successors of St. Peter,” nor does this surprise us, because the Vatican is a State and
not a “Church”!
IV) THE ELECTION OF YOUR EXCELLENCY
V) YOUR EXCELLENCY’S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DICTATORSHIP OF
ARGENTINA
VI) THE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL (1965)
“Everywhere man replaces the God-man. The man of European humanism has
taken his place on every European throne. However, outside of the God-man, man
does not exist – only as subhuman, half-human or non-human. Without the Godman,
man is in danger of being reduced to a devil-like creature, because sin is
simultaneously the power and image of the devil. Humanistic anthropocentrism is,
in its essence, devil-centrism, because both seek the same thing: to belong to
themselves, for themselves.
VII) YOUR EMININCE’S RELATIONS WITH ISLAM
You, Your Excellency, called on the West to intensify the dialogue with Islam and set as
your priority the fighting of poverty and the protection of the environment. You stated
that you intend to “strengthen the dialogue with Islam” and unbelievers, and to “build
bridges,” underlining the meaning of the word “Pontiff,” which in Latin means “bridgebuilder,”
or more specifically, “he who builds bridges between God and man.” You said:
“Hence it is important to intensify dialogue among the various religions, and I am
thinking particularly of dialogue with Islam,” stating that you felt thankful that so many
Muslim religious and civilian leaders attended your inaugural Mass.
VIII) YOUR EXCELLENCY’S RELATIONS WITH JUDAISM
IX) YOUR EXCELLENCY’S RELATIONS WITH FREEMASONRY
Along with the Jews, Your Excellency is a favorite of the Freemasons, who, according to
their own publications, were anxiously awaiting your election and rejoiced when you
were chosen! In a statement by the “Grand Master,” G. Raffi, he stresses that, “With
Pope Francis, nothing will be as it was before. It is a clear choice of fraternity for a
Church of dialogue, which is not contaminated by the logic and temptations of temporal
power. He is a man of the poor, far away from the Curia. Fraternity and the desire to
dialogue were his first concrete words. Perhaps nothing in the Church will be as it was
before. The simple cross he wore on his white cassock lets us hope that a Church of the
people will re-discover its capacity to dialogue with all men of good will and with
Freemasonry, which, as the experience of Latin America teaches us, works for the good
and progress of humanity!” So here is the heart of the matter: “dialogue with all men of
good will,” which means an intensifying of ecumenism!
Are you not aware, Your Excellency, that Freemasonry promotes, through Ecumenism,
the universal religion of Lucifer, as well as the fact that the source and womb of
Freemasonry is the hideous International Zionism? From Freemasonry’s own texts it is
established that they accept and believe in a divinity, which they call “The Great
Architect of the Universe” (G.A.O.T.U.). They have, of course, rites analogous with
those of the Church (“mysteries” or “sacraments” for example: marriage, altars, temples,
symbols, funerals, consecrations) with a specific typicon of rites. In the Masonic texts
G.A.O.T.U. is know by the names: Lucifer, Devil, Satan, Beelzebul, Belial, Baphomet,
Demon, etc. Freemasonry’s own ideas about its beliefs and confessions are clear.58 In the
Charter of the Grand Lodge of Greece (12-20-1949) it is clearly stated: “Freemasonry
believes in the existence of God under the cognomen ‘Great Architect of the Universe’.”
In the Masonic encyclopedia of N. X. Lascaris, published with the permission of the
Grand Lodge of Greece, in the entry “Religion and Masonry,” we read: “The Masonic
religion does not make distinctions. It accepts in its hospitable embrace men of all
dogmas; it neither completely prefers nor shuns any particular religious dogma… The
religion of Freemasonry is a universal religion of nature and of primeval revelation, with
which we were bequeathed by an ancient one and the patriarchal priesthood, in which all
men are able to co-exist.” Undisguised are the Syncretism and idolatry of Freemasonry,
but also its anti-Christian character, something that is clear from its claim at universality,
which is in direct conflict with the catholicity and ecumenicity of the Christian Faith and
Church. This was underlined in the historic decision of the Church of Greece in 193359,
according to which Freemasonry “is not a simple philanthropic organization or
philosophic school, but it forms a mystagogic system, and so reminds us of the ancient
ethnic mystery religions and cults. It is proven to be a mystery cult, completely
different… and foreign to the Christian religion… it seeks to include… in its embrace all
of humankind… it raises up itself to a kind of super religion.”60 In addition,
Archimandrite Epiphanios Theodoropoulos, of blessed memory, an enlightened spiritual
father and eminent theologian, stresses that Freemasonry “aspires to become the religion
of all mankind… to become a super religion.”61
Freemasonry is “pagan cult worship, an adversary of the pure Orthodox Catholic
Church.” That is to say, it is clearly an antichristian and pagan religion. The Masons are
“Satan worshipers and luciferists, followers of the religion of Antichrist.”62 We also
ascertain that the Freemasons, at least those in the higher degrees, are Satan worshipers,
praying to Lucifer as Baphomet, as they call their goat-headed god. Moreover, their
association with magic cannot be denied. Paul Naudon, a scholar in the history of their
law and a Freemason himself, informs us that certain rites have as their goal “the practice
of magic, which comes to the service of man giving him influence over the world.”63 The
claim by Freemasons that they do not occupy themselves with nor interfere in political
matters and developments is untrue. The religious character of Freemasonry, which also
functions expansively and universally, walks hand in hand with active involvement in
international political affairs. Its political involvement foresees the exercise of influence
on politicians in order to guide international political developments. It is by no means a
philanthropic organization, as they allege, which has as its goal the prevalence in society
of morals and ethics. The scandal involving the Italian Lodge P2 in 1981 is one of the
most significant confirmations of Freemasonry’s relationship with political intrigues.
X) YOUR EXCELLENCY’S RELATIONS WITH ATHEISM
Firstly, on the 23rd of May, 2013, you made an historic outreach to Atheists. “Atheists
should be seen as good people if they do good,” Your Excellency stated, in a call for
cooperation among all people, regardless of their religious beliefs. Speaking to atheists
you underlined the meaning of “doing good” as a principle, which unites all of mankind.
You related the story of a Papist, who once asked a priest if Jesus redeemed even atheists.
“Even them, everyone,” was the answer given, according to Vatican radio. If someone
told you that he was an atheist you would tell him: “We all have the duty to do good. Just
do good and we’ll find a meeting point.” Your addressing yourself to the atheists is in
direct contrast with the attitude and views of His former Excellency, Benedict XVI, who
many times caused non-Papists to feel like, as they put it, second-class believers.
XI) THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ONE WORLD RELIGION
XII) THE PROMOTION OF THE PAN-HERESY OF ECUMENISM
ΧΙΙI) THE ACCURSED AND DEMONIC UNIA
XIV) PRIMACY AND CONCILIARITY
XV) THE RING OF THE FISHERMAN
XVI) THE PAPAL “THRONAL FEASTS”
XVII) THE REMOVAL OF THE TITLE OF PATRIARCH OF THE WEST
The final fact, Your Excellency, which proves that you have no plans to set aside the
“Primacy of power,” is that you recently abandoned the title of Patriarch of the West.
According to some sources, the Annual Pontifical Yearbook “Annuario Pontificio”
includes information and facts about all the Papist activities. It is a diptych, a statistical
bulletin of information about the hierarchical structure of the Vatican. In this official
Yearbook, as is only natural, the “Pope” is referred to with all his official titles. This year,
with the resignation of His former Excellency Benedict, it was late in being published. In
the publication of the new Pontifical Yearbook of 2013, it is emphasized that you have
chosen, from the day of your election, to be referred to with the title “Bishop of Rome.”
At the same time, His Excellency, Benedict XVI, is referred to with the title “Supreme
Pontiff Emeritus.” In the previous Yearbook of 2012, His former Excellency is not only
referred to as “Bishop of Rome” but with all the titles, which have been given to him and
for which there has always existed sharp criticism from the Orthodox, such as: “His
Holiness Benedict XVI, Bishop of Rome, Vicar of Jesus Christ, Successor of the Prince
of the Apostles, Supreme Pontiff of the Universal Church, Primate of Italy, Archbishop
and Metropolitan of the Roman Province, Sovereign of the Vatican City State, Servant of
the servants of God,” however, with the removal of the title “Patriarch of the West.” This
year, however in the same location is found only the simple: “Francis – Bishop of
Rome.” The other titles did not disappear, they are found along with a short biographical
note (specifically on page 24), which was blank in the Yearbook of 2012. His former
Excellency Benedict’s name is written in Latin “Benedictus” and not in Italian, where as
your name is in Italian “Francesco” and not in Latin. In addition, the initials “PP,” which
stand for “Pope” appears before the name of His former Excellency, Benedict, where as it
is absent from your name. On the facing page of your photograph is found your signature
along with your name in English, while, for His former Excellency, is found the Latin
“Benedictus PP XVI.” Your Excellency, you have not renounced any of your Papal titles,
titles which have never been acceptable to the Orthodox Church, but only wished to place
them in a less conspicuous location on the following page. You do not wish to reinstate
the title “Patriarch of the West,” following His Emeritus Excellency, Benedict. Of course,
from an Orthodox stand point, this title, which is given to you, will be valid only when
you will be counted among the Orthodox Patriarchs. Only when you become Orthodox
could we speak of title of “Bishop of Rome” and “Patriarch of the West,” not, of course,
of those titles which are mentioned in the Papal Yearbook, because these were never
acceptable in the history of the Church. The title “Patriarch of the West,” according to
the previous answer of the Vatican Secretary regarding the promotion of Christian Unity,
is no longer in use. Again, your removal of the title “Patriarch of the West” has the
objective of affirming for a second time the Vatican’s claim to Universal Jurisdiction of
the “Pope” of Rome, which is reflected in all the other titles. Unfortunately you move
heaven and earth to refute all those who would label you a “reformer”! Not only do you
not intend to change the slightest thing in Papism, but you are impetuously continuing the
hard line of your successors. Regrettably, we are continuously and manifestly confirmed
in our convictions by your every move. As a genuine Jesuit, you are sworn to support the
Papist institution and, true to your vows, this is what you desire, to realize the grand
scheme, to become the spiritual world ruler!150
XVIII) PAPISM’S NEW ECCLESIOLOGY
XIX) PAPISM AND THE WORLD WIDE COUNCIL OF “CHURCHES” (W.C.C.)
XX) THE ORDINATION/PRIESTHOOD OF WOMEN
XXI) THE “CANONIZATION” OF POPES
XXII) PEDERASTY
XXIII) THE SHAMEFUL PASSION OF HOMOSEXUALITY
During your return trip from Brazil (July 29th, 2013), while speaking in-flight to
reporters, you issued a “liberal” (!) statement, in relation to the stance, which was held in
the past in Papism, regarding the issue of homosexuals. When a reporter asked you for
your opinion on homosexuals you answered: “If someone is gay and is searching for the
Lord and has good will, then who am I to judge this behavior?” In addition, you added
that homosexuals should not be marginalized, but on the contrary should be incorporated
into the community. You took sides against discrimination against homosexuals,
mentioning, however, the Papist policy, which states that, even if homosexual orientation
is not a sin, homosexual acts are. The distinguished newspaper, The Wall Street Journal,
in its report gives another dimension to your statements. Specifically, it maintains that, by
your statements about homosexuality you opened the way for the acceptance of
homosexual “priests.
XXIV) THE VATICAN BANK AND MONEY LAUNDERING
In 1978, “Pope” Paul VI reposed and was succeeded by Albino Luciani, who assumed his
duties in August of 1978 with the name John Paul I. Exactly thirty-three days after he
assumed office he died suddenly and inexplicably. He had expressed his desire to clean
up the Vatican and he had begun to take measures towards this end with the removal of
the above-mentioned individuals, along with many of their collaborators and the masons.
After his death it was said (without proof) that the “Pope” was murdered with digitalis.
An autopsy, however, was never performed. He was succeeded by the Pole Wojtyła, as
“Pope” John Paul II, and it was “business as usual.”
“Pope” John Paul II was succeeded by “Pope” Benedict XVI, whose resignation was due
as much to the Vatican’s homosexual scandal as for its economical scandals. Let us not
forget that shortly before his resignation there were official accusations by Italian
authorities regarding money laundering.
XXV) PAPISM’S SCHEME AGAINST GREECE
XXVI) YOUR EXCELLENCY’S IMPENDING VISITS TO JERUSALEM
AND TO THE PHANAR
According to reports, Your Excellency has accepted the invitation of His All-Holiness,
Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, to visit the Holy See of the First-Throne of the
Orthodox Christian Church at the Phanar, in the near future.228 Also, according to the
same sources, you agreed with the proposal of His All-Holiness, the Ecumenical
Patriarch, to meet him in the Holy City of Jerusalem in May of 2014, for the 50-year
anniversary of the meeting of your predecessors, Paul VI and Athenagoras.229 Finally, it
seems that you accepted the invitation to attend an important exhibition about Mt. Athos,
which will take place in 2015 at the Quirinal Palace in Italy, the inauguration of which is
expected to be performed by His All-Holiness, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, as
Bishop of the Monastic State.230
Truly, Your Excellency, what good can you possibly offer to the Orthodox, you who are
the chosen Jesuit “Pope” of the Jews, of the Rabbis, of the masons, of the dictators, of
America, of Ecumenism, of Pan-religion, of the “New Age of Aquarius,” and of the
“New World Order”?
With respect,
+ Andrew of Dryinoupolis, Pogoniani and Konitsa
+ Seraphim of Piraeus and Faliro
Link:
http://orthodoxinfo.com/ecumenism/epistle-to-pope-francis.pdf
Dit moet Bergoglio zeker 'pijn' doen.
Zij baseren hun aanklacht op de traditionele meningsverschillen tussen de katholieke en de orthodoxe Kerk, onder meer over het primaatschap van de paus. Maar er wordt eveneens verwezen naar handelingen van de paus, zoals het verlenen van een aflaat via Twitter of de zegening van een motor van Harley Davidson. Metropoliet Seraphin, een bekend tegenstander van elke toenadering met de katholieke Kerk, uitte in 2012 al eens een serie gelijkaardige beschuldigingen tegen paus Benedictus XVI (2005-2013).
Bron: KerkNet/I.Media
Link:
http://www.kerknet.be/actua/nieuws_detail.php?nieuwsID=122354
Link naar Vatican Insider:
http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/en/world-news/detail/articolo/ortodossi-ortodoxa-orthodox-francesco-francisco-francis-33491/
Enkele bedenkingen:
Op zich een erg merkwaardig bericht op 'Kerknet'.
Dit is natuurlijk géén nieuws, toch pikt 'Kerknet' het op.
Waar 'Kerknet' en deze twee schismatieke Grieks-Orthodoxe 'bisschoppen' mekaar vinden, is natuurlijk in het feit, dat ook 'Kerknet' het primaatschap van de Paus niet aanvaardt.
Dit staat natuurlijk los van de figuur van Bergoglio, die 'Kerknet' toch zo graag ophemelt.
De alliantie Bergoglio / Kerknet vindt zijn oorsprong in het feit, dat Kerknet natuurlijk denkt, dat Bergoglio, het primaatschap van de Paus zal ondermijnen.
We moeten de twee schismatieke 'bisschoppen' alvast bedanken, om even de puntjes op de 'i' te zetten.
De twee schismatieke 'bisschoppen' beschuldigen Bergoglio van syncretisme, pan-religie, New Age en New World Order.
Bergoglio heeft een probleem. De schismatiekers vertrouwen hem niet. Bergoglio is te links en te veel een modernist.
Door het gedrag van Bergoglio wordt de kloof tussen 'Katholieken' en 'Orthodoxen' alleen maar groter.
Van die 'oecumene' zal voorlopig dus weinig in huis komen!
Wordt vervolgd... Waarschijnlijk in Jeruzalem.
ENKELE CITATEN:
April 10, 2014
Greece
To His Excellency, Francis,
Head of State of the Vatican City
Vatican City, Rome
Your Excellency,
I) CRISIS IN THE VATICAN
II) THE SECULARIZATION AND SPIRITUAL DECLINE OF THE VATICAN
The absence of spirituality in the western heresy
has driven it into such absurdities that now even the “Pope” causes media storms with his “hip” persona!
III) THE RESIGNATION OF HIS EXCELLENCY, BENEDICT
The ink was barely dry on the dramatic announcement of the resignation of His
Excellency, Benedict, and hardly had the tears dried on the faces when the first bomb was
dropped, which, in all probability, was connected to his “quiet” resignation. In a report of
special interest, which was brought to light by the Greek website “ΞΥΠΝΗΣΤΕ ΡΕ,” we
read: “A German Pope abandons the Vatican and a German banker arrives. Ernstvon
Freyberg, who is 54 years old, will take over the reigns of a bank with 6 billion Euros and
44,000 secret accounts, amongst which is the Pontiff’s own account. The taking over of
the management of the Vatican Bank by the German banker is expected on 24th of May
2012, after his predecessor, Ettore Gotti Tedeschi, was dismissed for wanting the
finances of the Vatican to become more transparent. During this year the Bank was left
without a head, a fact which inflated the rumors about the non-transparency of the Pope’s
finances!” That is only a first answer to those who have rushed to have a look behind the
“pure motives” of the resignation! So much for the “holy business” of the “Holy See,” of
the “successors of St. Peter,” nor does this surprise us, because the Vatican is a State and
not a “Church”!
IV) THE ELECTION OF YOUR EXCELLENCY
V) YOUR EXCELLENCY’S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DICTATORSHIP OF
ARGENTINA
VI) THE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL (1965)
“Everywhere man replaces the God-man. The man of European humanism has
taken his place on every European throne. However, outside of the God-man, man
does not exist – only as subhuman, half-human or non-human. Without the Godman,
man is in danger of being reduced to a devil-like creature, because sin is
simultaneously the power and image of the devil. Humanistic anthropocentrism is,
in its essence, devil-centrism, because both seek the same thing: to belong to
themselves, for themselves.
VII) YOUR EMININCE’S RELATIONS WITH ISLAM
You, Your Excellency, called on the West to intensify the dialogue with Islam and set as
your priority the fighting of poverty and the protection of the environment. You stated
that you intend to “strengthen the dialogue with Islam” and unbelievers, and to “build
bridges,” underlining the meaning of the word “Pontiff,” which in Latin means “bridgebuilder,”
or more specifically, “he who builds bridges between God and man.” You said:
“Hence it is important to intensify dialogue among the various religions, and I am
thinking particularly of dialogue with Islam,” stating that you felt thankful that so many
Muslim religious and civilian leaders attended your inaugural Mass.
VIII) YOUR EXCELLENCY’S RELATIONS WITH JUDAISM
IX) YOUR EXCELLENCY’S RELATIONS WITH FREEMASONRY
Along with the Jews, Your Excellency is a favorite of the Freemasons, who, according to
their own publications, were anxiously awaiting your election and rejoiced when you
were chosen! In a statement by the “Grand Master,” G. Raffi, he stresses that, “With
Pope Francis, nothing will be as it was before. It is a clear choice of fraternity for a
Church of dialogue, which is not contaminated by the logic and temptations of temporal
power. He is a man of the poor, far away from the Curia. Fraternity and the desire to
dialogue were his first concrete words. Perhaps nothing in the Church will be as it was
before. The simple cross he wore on his white cassock lets us hope that a Church of the
people will re-discover its capacity to dialogue with all men of good will and with
Freemasonry, which, as the experience of Latin America teaches us, works for the good
and progress of humanity!” So here is the heart of the matter: “dialogue with all men of
good will,” which means an intensifying of ecumenism!
Are you not aware, Your Excellency, that Freemasonry promotes, through Ecumenism,
the universal religion of Lucifer, as well as the fact that the source and womb of
Freemasonry is the hideous International Zionism? From Freemasonry’s own texts it is
established that they accept and believe in a divinity, which they call “The Great
Architect of the Universe” (G.A.O.T.U.). They have, of course, rites analogous with
those of the Church (“mysteries” or “sacraments” for example: marriage, altars, temples,
symbols, funerals, consecrations) with a specific typicon of rites. In the Masonic texts
G.A.O.T.U. is know by the names: Lucifer, Devil, Satan, Beelzebul, Belial, Baphomet,
Demon, etc. Freemasonry’s own ideas about its beliefs and confessions are clear.58 In the
Charter of the Grand Lodge of Greece (12-20-1949) it is clearly stated: “Freemasonry
believes in the existence of God under the cognomen ‘Great Architect of the Universe’.”
In the Masonic encyclopedia of N. X. Lascaris, published with the permission of the
Grand Lodge of Greece, in the entry “Religion and Masonry,” we read: “The Masonic
religion does not make distinctions. It accepts in its hospitable embrace men of all
dogmas; it neither completely prefers nor shuns any particular religious dogma… The
religion of Freemasonry is a universal religion of nature and of primeval revelation, with
which we were bequeathed by an ancient one and the patriarchal priesthood, in which all
men are able to co-exist.” Undisguised are the Syncretism and idolatry of Freemasonry,
but also its anti-Christian character, something that is clear from its claim at universality,
which is in direct conflict with the catholicity and ecumenicity of the Christian Faith and
Church. This was underlined in the historic decision of the Church of Greece in 193359,
according to which Freemasonry “is not a simple philanthropic organization or
philosophic school, but it forms a mystagogic system, and so reminds us of the ancient
ethnic mystery religions and cults. It is proven to be a mystery cult, completely
different… and foreign to the Christian religion… it seeks to include… in its embrace all
of humankind… it raises up itself to a kind of super religion.”60 In addition,
Archimandrite Epiphanios Theodoropoulos, of blessed memory, an enlightened spiritual
father and eminent theologian, stresses that Freemasonry “aspires to become the religion
of all mankind… to become a super religion.”61
Freemasonry is “pagan cult worship, an adversary of the pure Orthodox Catholic
Church.” That is to say, it is clearly an antichristian and pagan religion. The Masons are
“Satan worshipers and luciferists, followers of the religion of Antichrist.”62 We also
ascertain that the Freemasons, at least those in the higher degrees, are Satan worshipers,
praying to Lucifer as Baphomet, as they call their goat-headed god. Moreover, their
association with magic cannot be denied. Paul Naudon, a scholar in the history of their
law and a Freemason himself, informs us that certain rites have as their goal “the practice
of magic, which comes to the service of man giving him influence over the world.”63 The
claim by Freemasons that they do not occupy themselves with nor interfere in political
matters and developments is untrue. The religious character of Freemasonry, which also
functions expansively and universally, walks hand in hand with active involvement in
international political affairs. Its political involvement foresees the exercise of influence
on politicians in order to guide international political developments. It is by no means a
philanthropic organization, as they allege, which has as its goal the prevalence in society
of morals and ethics. The scandal involving the Italian Lodge P2 in 1981 is one of the
most significant confirmations of Freemasonry’s relationship with political intrigues.
X) YOUR EXCELLENCY’S RELATIONS WITH ATHEISM
Firstly, on the 23rd of May, 2013, you made an historic outreach to Atheists. “Atheists
should be seen as good people if they do good,” Your Excellency stated, in a call for
cooperation among all people, regardless of their religious beliefs. Speaking to atheists
you underlined the meaning of “doing good” as a principle, which unites all of mankind.
You related the story of a Papist, who once asked a priest if Jesus redeemed even atheists.
“Even them, everyone,” was the answer given, according to Vatican radio. If someone
told you that he was an atheist you would tell him: “We all have the duty to do good. Just
do good and we’ll find a meeting point.” Your addressing yourself to the atheists is in
direct contrast with the attitude and views of His former Excellency, Benedict XVI, who
many times caused non-Papists to feel like, as they put it, second-class believers.
XI) THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ONE WORLD RELIGION
XII) THE PROMOTION OF THE PAN-HERESY OF ECUMENISM
ΧΙΙI) THE ACCURSED AND DEMONIC UNIA
XIV) PRIMACY AND CONCILIARITY
XV) THE RING OF THE FISHERMAN
XVI) THE PAPAL “THRONAL FEASTS”
XVII) THE REMOVAL OF THE TITLE OF PATRIARCH OF THE WEST
The final fact, Your Excellency, which proves that you have no plans to set aside the
“Primacy of power,” is that you recently abandoned the title of Patriarch of the West.
According to some sources, the Annual Pontifical Yearbook “Annuario Pontificio”
includes information and facts about all the Papist activities. It is a diptych, a statistical
bulletin of information about the hierarchical structure of the Vatican. In this official
Yearbook, as is only natural, the “Pope” is referred to with all his official titles. This year,
with the resignation of His former Excellency Benedict, it was late in being published. In
the publication of the new Pontifical Yearbook of 2013, it is emphasized that you have
chosen, from the day of your election, to be referred to with the title “Bishop of Rome.”
At the same time, His Excellency, Benedict XVI, is referred to with the title “Supreme
Pontiff Emeritus.” In the previous Yearbook of 2012, His former Excellency is not only
referred to as “Bishop of Rome” but with all the titles, which have been given to him and
for which there has always existed sharp criticism from the Orthodox, such as: “His
Holiness Benedict XVI, Bishop of Rome, Vicar of Jesus Christ, Successor of the Prince
of the Apostles, Supreme Pontiff of the Universal Church, Primate of Italy, Archbishop
and Metropolitan of the Roman Province, Sovereign of the Vatican City State, Servant of
the servants of God,” however, with the removal of the title “Patriarch of the West.” This
year, however in the same location is found only the simple: “Francis – Bishop of
Rome.” The other titles did not disappear, they are found along with a short biographical
note (specifically on page 24), which was blank in the Yearbook of 2012. His former
Excellency Benedict’s name is written in Latin “Benedictus” and not in Italian, where as
your name is in Italian “Francesco” and not in Latin. In addition, the initials “PP,” which
stand for “Pope” appears before the name of His former Excellency, Benedict, where as it
is absent from your name. On the facing page of your photograph is found your signature
along with your name in English, while, for His former Excellency, is found the Latin
“Benedictus PP XVI.” Your Excellency, you have not renounced any of your Papal titles,
titles which have never been acceptable to the Orthodox Church, but only wished to place
them in a less conspicuous location on the following page. You do not wish to reinstate
the title “Patriarch of the West,” following His Emeritus Excellency, Benedict. Of course,
from an Orthodox stand point, this title, which is given to you, will be valid only when
you will be counted among the Orthodox Patriarchs. Only when you become Orthodox
could we speak of title of “Bishop of Rome” and “Patriarch of the West,” not, of course,
of those titles which are mentioned in the Papal Yearbook, because these were never
acceptable in the history of the Church. The title “Patriarch of the West,” according to
the previous answer of the Vatican Secretary regarding the promotion of Christian Unity,
is no longer in use. Again, your removal of the title “Patriarch of the West” has the
objective of affirming for a second time the Vatican’s claim to Universal Jurisdiction of
the “Pope” of Rome, which is reflected in all the other titles. Unfortunately you move
heaven and earth to refute all those who would label you a “reformer”! Not only do you
not intend to change the slightest thing in Papism, but you are impetuously continuing the
hard line of your successors. Regrettably, we are continuously and manifestly confirmed
in our convictions by your every move. As a genuine Jesuit, you are sworn to support the
Papist institution and, true to your vows, this is what you desire, to realize the grand
scheme, to become the spiritual world ruler!150
XVIII) PAPISM’S NEW ECCLESIOLOGY
XIX) PAPISM AND THE WORLD WIDE COUNCIL OF “CHURCHES” (W.C.C.)
XX) THE ORDINATION/PRIESTHOOD OF WOMEN
XXI) THE “CANONIZATION” OF POPES
XXII) PEDERASTY
XXIII) THE SHAMEFUL PASSION OF HOMOSEXUALITY
During your return trip from Brazil (July 29th, 2013), while speaking in-flight to
reporters, you issued a “liberal” (!) statement, in relation to the stance, which was held in
the past in Papism, regarding the issue of homosexuals. When a reporter asked you for
your opinion on homosexuals you answered: “If someone is gay and is searching for the
Lord and has good will, then who am I to judge this behavior?” In addition, you added
that homosexuals should not be marginalized, but on the contrary should be incorporated
into the community. You took sides against discrimination against homosexuals,
mentioning, however, the Papist policy, which states that, even if homosexual orientation
is not a sin, homosexual acts are. The distinguished newspaper, The Wall Street Journal,
in its report gives another dimension to your statements. Specifically, it maintains that, by
your statements about homosexuality you opened the way for the acceptance of
homosexual “priests.
XXIV) THE VATICAN BANK AND MONEY LAUNDERING
In 1978, “Pope” Paul VI reposed and was succeeded by Albino Luciani, who assumed his
duties in August of 1978 with the name John Paul I. Exactly thirty-three days after he
assumed office he died suddenly and inexplicably. He had expressed his desire to clean
up the Vatican and he had begun to take measures towards this end with the removal of
the above-mentioned individuals, along with many of their collaborators and the masons.
After his death it was said (without proof) that the “Pope” was murdered with digitalis.
An autopsy, however, was never performed. He was succeeded by the Pole Wojtyła, as
“Pope” John Paul II, and it was “business as usual.”
“Pope” John Paul II was succeeded by “Pope” Benedict XVI, whose resignation was due
as much to the Vatican’s homosexual scandal as for its economical scandals. Let us not
forget that shortly before his resignation there were official accusations by Italian
authorities regarding money laundering.
XXV) PAPISM’S SCHEME AGAINST GREECE
XXVI) YOUR EXCELLENCY’S IMPENDING VISITS TO JERUSALEM
AND TO THE PHANAR
According to reports, Your Excellency has accepted the invitation of His All-Holiness,
Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, to visit the Holy See of the First-Throne of the
Orthodox Christian Church at the Phanar, in the near future.228 Also, according to the
same sources, you agreed with the proposal of His All-Holiness, the Ecumenical
Patriarch, to meet him in the Holy City of Jerusalem in May of 2014, for the 50-year
anniversary of the meeting of your predecessors, Paul VI and Athenagoras.229 Finally, it
seems that you accepted the invitation to attend an important exhibition about Mt. Athos,
which will take place in 2015 at the Quirinal Palace in Italy, the inauguration of which is
expected to be performed by His All-Holiness, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, as
Bishop of the Monastic State.230
Truly, Your Excellency, what good can you possibly offer to the Orthodox, you who are
the chosen Jesuit “Pope” of the Jews, of the Rabbis, of the masons, of the dictators, of
America, of Ecumenism, of Pan-religion, of the “New Age of Aquarius,” and of the
“New World Order”?
With respect,
+ Andrew of Dryinoupolis, Pogoniani and Konitsa
+ Seraphim of Piraeus and Faliro
Link:
http://orthodoxinfo.com/ecumenism/epistle-to-pope-francis.pdf
Dit moet Bergoglio zeker 'pijn' doen.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten